IQVC | 假學歷 • 香港法庭案件一覽 • 2026年2月至6月
⚖️ 法院定罪判刑個案
- 內地女假冒美國學歷入讀港大碩士，判監 4 個月
24 歲內地無業女子王一涵，實際畢業於河南大學，卻透過中介取得偽造的美國加州大學洛杉磯分校（UCLA）工程學士學位證明。她以此假學歷成功騙取香港大學錄取工程碩士課程，並向入境處申請來港就讀許可。被告在東區裁判法院承認一項「以欺騙手段取得服務罪」，裁判官直斥其行為剝奪他人入學機會，判處即時監禁 4 個月。
⚖️ 不經定罪／簽保守行為結案
- 內地女子涉以泰國大學假學歷申請優才計劃，獲撤控罪准自簽 $2,000 守行為兩年
劉碧璇（39 歲），涉以泰國先皇理工大學的虛假畢業文件申請「優才計劃」來港，被控「安排使用虛假文書」罪。沙田裁判法院開審時，控辯雙方達成商討，控方同意撤回控罪，主任裁判官黃國輝批准被告自簽 2,000 元守行為兩年，另須付 500 元堂費，期間不得干犯入境相關罪行。
⚖️ 法院裁決個案（罪名不成立）
- 內地男管有未註冊「基輔大學」證書副本申高才通，罪名不成立
38 歲持雙程證的內地男子李志成，來港申請身份證時，被入境處截查搜出一份看來由「基輔國立經貿大學（香港校區）」發出的碩士學歷文件副本，而教育局證實該校從未在港註冊。西九龍裁判法院裁判官施祖堯引述案例指出，控方只能證明文件「內容」虛假，但未能證明該副本在「製作上」（如簽署人身份或日期）屬偽造，不符法律上「虛假文書」的詮釋，裁定被告管有虛假文書罪名不成立。
- 內地女涉申請高才通虛報澳洲學歷，罪名不成立（官指疑遭中介蒙騙）
被告徐麗娜（36 歲）被控串謀詐騙罪。案情指其中介人在網上為其申請高才通時，虛報其持有澳洲悉尼科技大學學士學歷（B類申請）。沙田裁判法院裁判官黃國輝指出，被告家庭年收入逾 250 萬元，本身完全符合高才通 A類（高收入人士） 的申請資格，根本無需作假。由於網上申請由中介一手包辦，表格上的電郵、電話及簽名均不屬於被告，法庭考慮到中介可能為賺取 52 萬中介費而瞞著被告「從中作梗」偽造學歷，裁定被告罪名不成立。
⚖️ 審訊與提堂押後個案
- 持雙程證男涉泰國大學假學歷瞞入境處，被告不認罪
37 歲內地男子韓勝男，被控一項「使用虛假文書」罪，涉嫌於 2024 年使用虛假的泰國皇太后大學（Mae Fah Luang University）畢業證書及學業成績單欺騙入境事務處處長。案件於 2026 年 6 月 8 日在沙田裁判法院再訊，被告表明不認罪。控方以需時聯絡海外大學證人及評估安排海外證人以視像作供為由申請押後，案件獲批准押後再訊。
IQVC | Fake Academic Qualifications • Court Cases in Hong Kong • Feb to Jun 2026
⚖️ Conviction and Sentencing Cases
- Mainland woman jailed for 4 months for using fake US academic qualifications to enroll in HKU Master’s programme
Wang Yihan (24), an unemployed Mainland woman who actually graduated from Henan University, used an agent to obtain a forged bachelor’s degree certificate in engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Using this fake qualification, she successfully deceived the University of Hong Kong (HKU) into admitting her to a Master of Engineering programme and applied to the Immigration Department for a student visa to enter Hong Kong. The defendant pleaded guilty to one count of “obtaining services by deception” at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts. The magistrate criticized her actions for depriving others of admission opportunities and sentenced her to 4 months of immediate imprisonment.
⚖️ Cases Resolved Without Conviction / Bound Over
- Mainland woman suspected of using fake Thai university qualifications to apply for Quality Migrant Admission Scheme (QMAS) has charges withdrawn; granted HK$2,000 bind-over order for 2 years
Liu Bixuan (39) was charged with “arranging the use of a false instrument” for allegedly using forged graduation documents from King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang in Thailand to apply for the QMAS to come to Hong Kong. When the trial commenced at the Shatin Magistrates’ Courts, the prosecution and defense reached an agreement, and the prosecution agreed to withdraw the charges. Principal Magistrate Wong Kwok-fai ordered the defendant to be bound over in the sum of HK$2,000 for two years, and to pay HK$500 in court costs. She must not commit any immigration-related offenses during this period.
⚖️ Court Acquittals (Not Guilty)
- Mainland man found not guilty of possessing a copy of an unregistered “Kyiv University” certificate to apply for Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS)
Li Zhicheng (38), a Mainland man holding a two-way permit, was intercepted by Immigration Department officers while applying for his Hong Kong ID card. Officers found a copy of a Master’s degree certificate purportedly issued by the “Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design (Hong Kong Campus),” which the Education Bureau confirmed was never registered in Hong Kong. He was charged with one count of “possession of a false instrument.” Magistrate Sze Cho-yau of the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts cited case law, stating that the prosecution could only prove the “content” of the document was false, but failed to prove that the copy was a forgery in its “making” (such as the identity of the signatory or the date). As it did not meet the legal definition of a “false instrument,” the defendant was found not guilty of possession of a false instrument.
- Mainland woman found not guilty of making false representations about Australian academic qualifications when applying for TTPS (Magistrate suspects deception by agent)
The defendant, Xu Lina (36), was charged with conspiracy to defraud. The prosecution alleged that her agent falsely claimed she held a bachelor’s degree from the University of Technology Sydney (Category B application) when applying for the TTPS online on her behalf. Magistrate Wong Kwok-fai of the Shatin Magistrates’ Courts pointed out that the defendant’s annual family income exceeded HK$2.5 million, meaning she fully qualified for the TTPS Category A (High-income individuals) and had absolutely no motive to falsify documents. Since the online application was handled entirely by the agent, and the email, phone number, and signature on the form did not belong to the defendant, the court considered that the agent might have acted behind her back to forge the qualifications in order to earn the HK$520,000 agency fee. The defendant was acquitted.
⚖️ Trials and Mentions Adjourned
- Mainland man holding a two-way permit pleads not guilty to using fake Thai university qualifications to deceive the Immigration Department
Han Shengnan (37), a Mainland man, was charged with one count of “using a false instrument” for allegedly using a forged graduation certificate and academic transcript from Mae Fah Luang University in Thailand to deceive the Director of Immigration in 2024. The case came before the Shatin Magistrates’ Courts again on June 8, 2026, where the defendant pleaded not guilty. The prosecution requested an adjournment to contact witnesses from the overseas university and to assess the feasibility of arranging for them to testify via video link. The court granted the application and adjourned the case for further mention.
參考資料 Reference:
The Witness https://thewitnesshk.com/